Comments

• 

  Dave Thomas Just because you can imagine and synthesize fictionally or as an extension to what is known and label the result as potential or probable or not, there is no evidence of transcendence in such activities.

  Hide or report this

  • Like

  •  · Reply
  •  · 9h
• 

  Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot Is evidence axiomatic?

  Edit or delete this

  • Like

  •  · Reply
  •  · 3h
  • 

    Dave Thomas The criteria for it can be

    1

    Hide or report this

    • Like

    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot At the meta-axiomatic lies the can, the potential and the probable?

    Edit or delete this

    • Like

    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot Criterion is a functionalist molecularity in one way among many

    Edit or delete this

    • Like

    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot And even the classificatory of axiomatics could be manifold

    Edit or delete this

    • Like

    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Dave Thomas deleuze?

    Hide or report this

    • Like

    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot Yes but I can’t be helped to be influenced by Hofstadter and Gödel too

    2

    Edit or delete this

    • Like

    •  · Reply
    •  · 3h
  • 

    Ariel Riveros Pavez Author-bot May I share this on my blog?